"When our spelling is perfect, it's invisible. But when it's flawed, it prompts negative associations." - Marilyn vos Savant



Showing posts with label art review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label art review. Show all posts

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Pet Shop Boys Elysium art review

The vinyl and double CD of Pet Shop Boys Elysium.
The rainbow was coincidental on there from my crystal statue by the window.


Recently, I have been listening to Pet Shop Boys latest album Elysium and I must say I was truly impressed.  It is the eleventh studio album produced by the band as well as Andrew Dawson, the producer beyond Kanye West, Jay-Z, etc. I gotten my copy at the Amoeba store, as I’m finding myself in the store a lot lately, the price wasn’t so bad either. I actually ordered mine on Amazon but apparently they didn’t have one at stock, so basically I waited for nothing. So I called and checked and finally came to the conclusion to just cancel it and then go to the store.  I guess it was a reason for me to get it there because I not only gotten the double disc but also the vinyl, as well as “Suburbia”(Chris on the front cover) and “Opportunities” (Gray cover).  I’ll be frankly honest, when I first saw the cover, I wasn’t all that enthuse about it because it did look like an image slapped on something or wasn’t thought of properly. But when I saw it in person, it looked beautiful and after knowing what it was about, it made much sense. The vinyl looks so beautiful it was a submerged of the regular edition (the water and sand) and the double disc edition (the sky) together like a mirroring image. And the choices of the colors amazed me even more: the blue and orange kind of gave me a Very/Can You Forgive Her? Type feel and ironically at the closing ceremonies, they had the cone hats but they were in black but still. But the album itself is more of a Behaviour-esque sound than any of their albums; the whole part of reflecting and calmness and about afterlife and death and depicting a story it a fascinating way. The sleeve covers as well really intrigued me because I would discuss about primary and secondary colors and now it’s like it’s a coincidence. The sleeves on the vinyl are orange and a deep purple which are secondary colors and then on the double disc it had one primary color which is blue and the other two are secondary colors: brighter purple and green. The packaging for the deluxe edition is nice just, like the Format and (so I have read) like the PopArt 3 CD set. And it gets even better about the album, is that it was very unusual that they released the second CD with all instrumentals, because I adore a lot of their instrumentals it’s like they seriously read my mind or something or it was a pure coincidence. Even though Relentless does have instrumentals, but it’s not a full instrumental CD or album, that’s if you want to make a comparison between the two. But it would make sense because after listening to the instrumentals, it was really good. It gives the songs a different tone verses Neil’s voice along with the back up singers. I personally listen to the instrumental versions a bit more because it gives a heavenly sound or the idea of being in the afterlife or peacefulness. My favorites on Elysium is “Leaving”, “Invisible”, “Your Early Stuff”,  “A Face Like That”, “Ego Music”, “Memory of the Future” and “Requiem in Denim and Leopardskin.” For the instrumentals the whole CD is good. It just really takes you there in euphoria. It’s like a journey of going back and for on life, afterlife, and so forth.  I also gotten the commentary last night, I didn’t want to come out of pocket because I heard about a promotional code but it’s okay, since my aunt gave me a gift card, thank God for aunts right?  It was a short but funny commentary about the songs with the Boys as well as David Walliams. I found out the Water sisters not only sung with Michael Jackson as backing vocals but also as well for Adele too or “Ego Music” is like the second part to “How Can You Expect to be Taken Seriously?”

A few comments I would like to point out that sounded like something familiar to me on a few songs in my honest opinion. “Leaving” on the beats or sound, it reminded me of Soft Cell’s “Bedsitter” 12-inch mixed with Dusty Springfield’s “In Private” well her version of the song. “Ego Music” actually reminded me of their demos where Neil be talking or having a dialogue conversation almost like “Closer to Heaven” demo or “My Night” demo. Then there’s a song on the Bratz movie where the antagonist sings a song called “It’s All About Me” kind of reminded about that, even though it doesn’t have anything to do with the song itself.  “Memory of the Future” is almost like a second installment with the word Future, because on Yes, their previous album, well the limited edition it had “This Used to be the Future” featuring Philip Oakey (Human League). I know the songs are different but the title alone sounds like some kind of trilogy thing about future, first on what it used to be, two now Memory of the Future. So it would almost go hand in hand. I would also point out that I didn’t like “Invisible” at first but it finally grow on me; however,  “Winner” won’t unless I hear it live, used in the proper context or the HappySad remix. It just doesn’t sound like something they would put out and it is a cheesy song unless it was used properly like at the Olympics Parade or something like that. And the other songs I haven’t mentioned, they would have to grow on me but the instrumentals are good, so it’s best to get the double disc if you can. My views on this will change but this is how I feel at the moment. Overall It’s a nice album minus a few songs, it does give me a Disney soundtrack vibe just a wee bit but still good.

Sunday, June 17, 2012

Art review on Pet Shop Boys Alternative and Format.

Alternative(lenticular casing) left
Format (right)

These both B-side sets are a real fascination to me, because of the contrast between light and dark which I really like. Alternative:The darkness where try are wearing fencing masks, really gave me the sense of being trapped or stuck or even suffocating. Where as Format it doesn’t consist of them at all; however, each line represents the albums and tracks on Format, the colors as well as the graphics according to Mark Farrow and the colors and the dominant color is white and it looks like a liberated ideal to me. Both were designed by Mark Farrow, Alternative was with Pete Mauder. Alternative was originally going to be called Besides but then with the Lenticular casing (which I have), Neil’s and Chris’ faces shifted and that’s how it became Alternative instead. I also have the regular one, I keep it because my mother really likes Alternative, but I love the lenticular casing version way better. I don’t really have a favorite they both look really neat and symbolize something unique. Eric Watson done the portraits inside the booklet of Alternative and Richard Burbridge did the photos of them in masks. Format I think if I’m not mistaken was one of the ways a piece of music would be in. Both were B-sides sets have interviews of the band by Jon Savage; I definitely get the sense of Invisibility in Format because there’s no photos of them. Also Format consists of bonus tracks as well as B-sides. The Lenticular casing version is a box but the opening is on the side where the booklet and the CD case are inside. The bootklet have both Neil and Chris and the CD case (interior) have Chris on it. Format have the booklet and the two CDs in a coat cover like Ultimate(deluxe) I heard this version of Alternative is rare, I was blessed to find this version at Amoeba store. There’s a vinyl version with the lenticular casing as well. Again I really love the contrast between the two B-sides. It’s nice to have the better versions of the CD sets because you definitely get your money’s worth. I gotten Format on the UK version of Amazon, I saw the US version of Format, it’s not as good looking as the UK version of Format.


My favorite songs on Alternative~                           My favorite songs on Format~(still testing this out)
"A Man Could Get Arrested"                                   "Blue on Blue"
"In the Night"                                                           "We're All Criminals Now"
"That's My Impression"                                            "Nightlife"
"Was That What it Was?"                                         "No Time For Tears(7-inch mix)
"Paninaro"                                                                "Transparent"
"I Want a Dog"                                                        "Lies"
"Do I Have To?"                                                     "Delusions of Grandeur"
"The Sound of the Atom Splitting"                         "Silver Age"
"One of the Crowd"                                                "Discoteca (new version)"
"Your Funny Uncle"                                               "Gin and Jag"
"We All Feel Better in the Dark"                             "After the Event"
"Losing My Mind"                                                  "We're the Pet Shop Boys"
"Music for Boys"                                                    "Screaming"
"Shameless"                                                            "The Resurrectionist"
"Too Many People"                                                "Party Song"
"Violence (Haçienda version)"                                "Sexy Northerner"
"Euroboy"                                                                "Casting a Shadow"
"Some Speculation"

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Marc Almond - Glamerama (Part 1 of 2) art review

   
Marc Almond in Glamerama

I don’t really know much about this or there’s fact on the American site for this. I can tell you what I know what people told me about it.  This is a rare segment of art during Marc Almond’s college years in Leeds Polytechnic in 1978. It does consist of narration but silent acting and body gestures, so you would have to depict what is trying to be conveyed here of Marc and his friends. You can also see that on the credits, Marc’s name was Mark. He gotten legally changed later on, because one he love Marc Bolan, one of his idols (was with Gloria Jones, the original singer to “Tainted Love”) and then he didn’t want nothing to remind him of his father. The two scenes you see Marc in are basically abstract and surreal in a way. Marc and a woman are slurping on what appears to be a bong or something like it, the music is very fascinating makes you wonder if Art of Noise had a soundtrack to it. The next seen you would see Marc in some woman bondage and squirting liquid on a woman that looks like he was in a hypnotic trance. You probably wonder how Soft Cell gotten their music video art ideas from.  You would also see from break periods of the footage where you seen magazine, comic book scraps of women and men, and different colors of art. I would say it could be Pop and Op art since it was already at it’s peak since this was the mid to 70’s here.  It’s bizarre but that’s how art can be sometimes, I would definitely watch it, if you’re a Marc Almond/Soft Cell fan and love art. Thankfully the youtuber didn’t delete it, because this is really rare, I don’t know what it’s really about, but I do know it’s art and the title does speak for itself.  He only appears in two scenes of this. And if you wonder why Marc pranced about in the 80’s then look no further! If you're the lucky person that have this, cherish it! I would love to own this item one day. 

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Pet Shop Boys' Pandemonium tour art review part 1


Pet Shop Boys Pandemonium tour art review
Live at the O2 Arena, London December 21, 2009

 
This tour starts off with a animated simulation of different parts of London and angles of the Arena and each frame or different scene, you can see a cube formulating and getting larger while “More Than a Dream (magical dub mix)” submerging to “Heart”.  The designer is Es Devlin, which previously did the Fundamental tour that is also called Cubism on the DVD. I like the fact that she was on this commentary. I would have also liked to hear her view on Fundamental as well. I would have to say that between the two concerts, they practically meet a equilibrium of colors, art, costumes, and energy and having a newer generation around an old one.  This includes a CD version but it doesn’t have all the songs on it like the DVD does, the following is not on the CD: “Jealousy”, “The Way It Used to Be”, ”Building a Wall”, “What Have I Done to Deserve This”, and “All Over the World”. The DVD extras include: “My Girl” (Live at the O2), “It Doesn’t Often Snow at Christmas” (live at the O2),  “Love, etc”(music video), “All Over the World”(music video), “Did You See Me Coming”(music video), 2009 BRIT Awards performance featuring Lady Gaga and Brandon Flowers(The Killers) and an audio commentary by the Pet Shop Boys and Es Devlin. This is concert is based from their album Yes along with their previous released songs and then some cover songs. This to me is a triumph type of concert because they still around and still make music and having a lot of vintage of their past and so on and the vivid display represents a feel of an excitement of an accomplishment.


 
 I like the uniformity of “Heart” in the performance of it. The theme with the cubes and even the fact the musicians themselves: Neil and Chris, which Devlin begged them to wear the boxes on their heads, along with the two females dancers that are twins. It seems that the projections never really fail for these guys. I mean they used projections in MCMLXXIX, Somewhere, Discovery, Montage, and Fundamental, all previous tours. The method that was used was different and unique because they used fifty cardboard boxes with a projection reflecting on them.  Especially seeing cubes within cubes almost like optical illusion really. I like how also too that the two dancers that were on keyboard looking like they were assisting Chris, and then both were balanced too, color balance because one was wearing the warm colors and the other was wearing cooler colors, a very excellent contrast. Now back to the projections, it was suppose to be a slick trick to make it seem like it was two big screens. Then the balloons are suppose to be a reference to their Christmas EP according to Neil in the commentary. Of course he does the signature hand over heart move.  Then onwards to “Did You See Me Coming” bit where Neil sings a line “Every night is Friday night, welcome to my life, every night is Friday Night” and you see the other two dancers on the cubes and digitalized and pixelated and vivid: a clash between opposing colors, and they are doing gestures almost like sign language but with the body while the lyrics is heard. “Pandemonium” and “Can You Forgive Her” are submerged(making a small point, Pandemonium is supposedly to sound like Amii Stewart) I like this visualization here because it’s a bird’s eye view of what’s going on and the colors really fit the tones, giving some mix of happiness and chaotic.  And when the singing starts you can see their heads, it’s also symbolic in way, but they are oblivious to what’s going on. Neil and Chris are black and white so that also proves that point too. Then afterwards you hear a brief welcome by Neil, and then “Love, Etc” plays like the video was edited for the concert, “Love, Etc” was also had a cut out from the song. “I believe, we can achieve, love between need, I believe, call me naïve, love is for free” I agree, it does sound pretty awkward. I also noticed Devlin pointed out how Neil was standing in the right position, because if he was slightly off, he would have cast a shadow on the boxes, it really does reveal how practice and memory are important. And then part where the song ends and Neil’s hands are stretched out it was right on cue where the pac-man versions of them were going in opposing directions; art is meant to be taken seriously, because even the little can make a giant mess.  Now you have it where Chris is banging on the flat drums. I like the greyscale tones he have around him, great usage of uniformity there. “Building a Wall” and “Integral” are submerged together next and you see pixelated versions of Neil and Chris on the big screens. I also forgot to point out, I also see two set of the screens on the left and right top parts of the arena but they look kind of 3-D, it kind of brings a reminiscence of the previous concert Cubism,(Fundamental) or the idea of it. I like how Neil’s voice got robotic during the chorus of “Building a Wall” and I also like the symmetry of them speaking well the screening part. And then by Chris banging the drums, it gives it some kind of intensity of the song like something is about to happen, and he did play the drums before. Then you see the two dancers in the screen moving and putting blocks to cover the heads up but they multiply as they putting them on there, I like how they are dressed in two primary colors. It’s pretty funny to see that the screen version of Neil and Chris are going away and let the real ones show it it’s done. This mash up was okay, but I like the previous two better, even though one was just used as instrumental. Devlin pointed out that the two screens were exactly proportional to the ones were used back in the Fundamental tour. I like how the screen tumbled down like a wall, which makes because of the song., and the lighting gives it more of a feel that it was the one that knocked them down. Then you see some of the crew members moving the props around, so the dancers and musicians won’t fall or trip of anything. Then “Go West” begins then you see Sean Williams and Charlotte Walcott for the first time, the twins’ names are Sophie and Polly Duniam. Again great lighting and usage of color and using one of the dancers as part of the visual, but I still have a love hate on the visual of the music video. But this on here, I’m fine with. This visual was filmed before the tour, and Sean is wearing a wig, which quite a shock, had no idea. I like the organization of the movements here, they are exactly like the visual. I also like to bring up that red, green, blue, and yellow are actually color are from the original clocks they had back in the day, I used to have some, so it’s pretty cool it gives off that youthful feel (in my opinion) Then you can see Charlotte in it too, I like the gender change and the ethnicity, very cultural. And Neil points out this version of “Go West” have the rhythmic track of “Paninaro” I didn’t hear it at first until I played it again. Devlin points out that the boxes are cardboard but reinforced and have to be flameproof, I never heard of that before, no wonder why they are expensive! Then when the song change it’s key, then you the two dancers in different colors on the screen in multiples, and you can here the other two dancers singers singing in the background, when it’s their cue. Then the dancers that are on stage moved the boxes around for the next seen, the symbols on the visual was very good, you have multi-cultural feel, to get the viewers attention.


The second part you here “Two Divided by Zero” and then submerged with “Why Don’t We Live Together” mind you that the beginning of this sounds like Shannon’s “Let the Music Play” and you hear a electronic voice saying “PSB and NYC, and then the count off of one through four” along with the versatile (very vintage because people don’t use them anymore according to Devlin) and then you hear the original “Two Divided by Zero” voice. Then you see a digitalized version of New York in the early 80’s , so it kind of brings you back on how they started off recording really based on what Neil said; very symbolic. Then you Chris with his deadly mirror shard covered jacket and Neil with his modern nylon jacket from Lexinburg *, it was sale supposedly, it symbolizes the Run-Dmc look, based on what Neil says. Chris’ jacket was made by a guy name Jeffrey Bryant and it was done in six weeks. And crazy thing Chris’ jacket almost put Neil’s eye out too, and then Chris’ neck too; which is why they have to be in separate areas to change I’m pretty sure that Chris is keeping that jacket, no one can touch if he wears it! The vividness of the visual gives it also a midnight metropolis idea.  And you see the twin dancers dressed up like flashy dancers with nice shoes. Devlin points out that It’s a fashion show, the idea was that Charlotte and Sean went off to New York, they went West, China, and ended up in New York with nameless fashion people.” So really in a way it’s telling a story pretty much like Performance was doing. Then you see Sean dancing with the female fashion dressed dancers, in a different, fashionable clothes, And again until the next song. This time they dressed up as building in New York, one I can point out at the moment is the Empire State Building, and they are made out of cardboard. It’s amazing how something so simple can be used again and again. The costumes look very comical, then you hear a bit of “In the Night”  I also here bits of “Opportunities” as well. Then the dancers are doing an iconic dance number inspired by Madonna’s “Dress You Up” which Chris also dances too. I like the fact he didn’t leave the commentary room, like he did in Performance, even though he didn’t see himself dance in here either, but he stayed thankfully. In costume, I don’t know if it was out of coincidence, but Neil, Chris and the dancers are on a greyscale in costume-wise which is very symmetrical, and you here a line from their song “Left to my Own Devices” towards the end of the song. Then you here “New York City Boy” playing instead of a digital version of New York, you see actual clips of it, but they are from the videos of “Was It Worth It?” and “New York City Boy” and you see the singers/dancers dressed up in their uniformed outfits with more symmetry there only this time in color form.  Everything is pretty much balanced and I noticed they took some bits off on this song too. Then “Always on My Mind” plays and Neil points out that Chris is reading music on that screen he’s looking at, and they did it on their last tour, some Chris can’t remember by memory and some he can, I’m guessing the most used songs he can remember by heart and then vice versa.  The visuals are a reminiscent of Newcastle and Blackpool, because it’s where they are from and you occasional cube looking like amplifiers when you audio coming out. This was also used at the Brits, but was something else at first, more abstract based on Devlin but they needed something popping out, which she’s right because you need a contrast of something otherwise it would be a conflict or conflicting the point was being conveyed. When the dancers are jumping on a trampoline, it kind of reminded me of New Order’s “True Faith” music video somehow, I don’t know why. It was interesting that Neil pointed out that this wasn’t the best crowd they had, I wonder what peoples’ thought were if they heard this commentary. Sounds pretty disappointing but hey, you can’t please everyone right? The visual of the cubes matched the lighting, which was cool, it’s funny how the colors are all bright but the song is cynical, what a strange irony isn’t it? Then “Closer to Heaven/Left to my Devices” have started, I like the visual on this because of the Rubix cube comeback and you see the dancers dancing and getting in position. I like the effect of the falling boxes (possible explosion bit too) and then you can see it being part of the screen very 3-D, which is neat. The clock kind of gives him the idea of turning back time because these are their older songs with the exception of a few of them, and then you see more objects like cellphones, teapots, balloons, part of the cubes, etc coming out and the guy made it where it was close to the lyrics. Then the explosion goes in reverse, almost reminds me of the idea of Soft Cell’s "Bedsitter" line: ”Start the Nightlife over again” then it goes forward and slow, it really basically picks up the rhythm of Neil singing really and the song, and then goes backwards again.  It does bring a musical theater tone. Yeah, I agree with Neil, it’s a lot of work, that’s why it’s a lot to cover. Since the “Left to my Own Devices” line was used now he uses names and reverberates lines from it and “Heart” which makes sense for this because the same guy who did it was the same one who did the “Heart” visual. The lighting light movements are a rock based idea. This was indeed color coordinated.


 


“Do I Have To?/Kings Cross” This is where the only song that was tracked meaning Chris is actually playing by hand, I like this because it gives Chris another spotlight moment, and the song gives a romantic dark feel, but it’s moment where Neil and the girls getting a costume change. But I think by him wearing the mirror jacket still for this moment was a brilliant idea, because the lighting was perfect and he glows! It was pretty comedic because that a short riff and getting costume change it like their clock. Chris calls it his embarrass look, looks like a bashful look to me, finally seeing him playing on a keyboard like almost how he was playing on a pipe organ on Life in Pop. They call it a toilet break, it was pretty funny, then you hear this song have an extra sound in it. Now you see Neil in a tuxedo top and the twins in red all over, color coordination here. I actually always thought there would be a music video for this song because it’s a beautiful song, but it’s the best you can get from this. This is another vintage moment where you get the 40’s ballroom hand gesture according to Devlin, and I agree with Neil when he pointed out the surrealism of the dancers with the cubes and doing something back in the 40’s, but that’s how art can really be. Devlin gives a nice visualization, but I won’t say it, it’s up to you to buy the DVD/CD or hear the commentary yourself. I like the opposing colors of red and green, it gives it a intense passion feel for it. And speaking of surreal, it’s even more surreal that someone wearing a mirror jacket is playing on a keyboard to being the 40’s back. Now you have “Kings Cross” playing then you see light or became bright. You also get another reminiscent by the late Derek Jarman, a footage of “Kings Cross” (which also have bits from the “Rent” video in it as well; that was used for Pet Shop Boys’ MCMLXXXIX tour, it’s a well over 20 years old. You also hear the singers in the back.

I will continue the rest of this concert art review on another post soon, since this is going to be a long one. Stay Tuned! 

Sunday, April 22, 2012

T-Total Ft. Marc Almond - Baby's on Fire art review

 

This video got art written all over it, from comic book art and a modern version of Pop Art and optical illusion. Not only that but also a neat contrast between color and black and white. I also like the fact the outfit Marc wears matches a lot of the pop out and moving words, and even have the words “Baby’s On Fire” even the band T-Total were matching. The part where Marc says “the photographers snip snap, you hear camera noises, it reminded immediately the audio clean version of Soft Cell’s “Sex Dwarf” when he stated get my little camera take a pretty picture, you also hear noises of a camera. I did noticed how Marc isn’t like he used to be on the camera, moving all over the place, I mean he still does it, and you can’t argue that this video he does, but it’s not like a prancing motion, it’s more structured and mature, but he does more of acting gestures in this video.  The objects moving every which way in the video also kind of reminded me of La Roux’s “Bulletproof” video in an odd way, then again it’s the UK, but I like the effects it have; especially when Marc sings and certain key words would pop up.  The dominant colors in the video are red, white and blue, black, white and pink, there’s more colors of course but those were the dominant ones I saw. The effects of the noises were fascinating, was it suppose to be a woman in agony or something, I mean henceforth the title. At first, I thought it was about an infant being on fire, with Marc, it’s pretty unpredictable, but then after I thought about a woman and it made more sense, talking about being melancholy. I personally love this video, one of Marc’s best work in the 2000’s shows that he is still vibrant and hanging in there. This video is also vintage because of certain parts Marc looks all comic book like with all the dots, something Lichtenstein based and then the microphone he uses as vintage like the one in Soft Cell’s “Torch” video.  So in other words this video is worth watching, if you haven’t seen it! Also it really feels like a continuation of Soft Cell’s “What” video because of the several art references and a hint of “A Lover Spurned” too and the lyrics are pretty comical. 

Saturday, March 31, 2012

Pet Shop Boys/Britney Spears/Adele/Rihanna + 3 (Marc Johnce Mashup) art review

 


As a lot of you music fans/petheads know that this was featured on the Pet Shop Boys official site a while back. I love Mash-ups only if everything is in rhythm and it's balanced. This is an excellent example of that, it's actually one of the few I heard that doesn't last an hour. I am not knocking the hour long ones because they are good, but sometimes keeping it basic is real good too! The title of the mash-up even stood out to me "Did You See Me Moving Along?" It kind of reminded me of other songs I have been listening to through the course of this year: Hanson's "Weird", A-ha's "I Wish I Cared",Depeche Mode's "People Are People","Shake the Disease","Try Walking in My Shoes","But Not Tonight", "Wrong","Enjoy the Silence",The Gorillaz- "Feel Good Inc.", Regency Buck "Free to Change Your Mind", New Radicals' "You Get What You Give", Erasure's -"The Circus", Anita Baker - "Giving You the Best That I've Got",Camouflage- "Great Commandment", New Order's "True Faith", Soft Cell's "Where The Heart Is","Insecure? Me?","Monoculture","Tainted Love", Human League's "Human", Phil Collins' -"In the Air Tonight", "Another Day in Paradise", and Pet Shop Boys' "Love, Etc", "It's Alright", "One Thing Leads to Another", "Lies"and "End of the World","Paninaro"," to name a handful that read struck out to me lyric wise, and some relate and some don't, but it defines a feeling of the power of love to keep moving along and hanging in there. In fact, It's actually inspiring and encouraging in my opinion, especially going through a rough time. It consists of The Pet Shop Boys - "Did You See Me Coming", Britney Spears - "Till The World Ends" ,Adele - "Rolling In The Deep", Huey Lewis & The News - "The Power Of Love", The All-American Rejects - "Move Along", The Bloodhound Gang - "Bad Touch" , Rihanna ft. David Guetta - "Who's That Chick" What's really dynamic about it as well, is that you have a nice amounts of generations here and ethnicity.

It's by Dan Mei and Marc Johnce (2009)

Mashup & Video Edit By Marc Johnce:
http://marcjohnce.com
http://www.facebook.com/marcjohncemashups
http://www.twitter.com/marcjohnce
here are the links for it or just type in "Did You See Me Coming" mash up on youtube, that's what I do.


The video in art aspects I would have to say it's an abstract, structured collage, meaning it have a bunch of different themes but at the same time, it have a relation to how people are in everyday life, almost like the title of the Godfathers' song "Birth, Work, School, Death", but more to the appeal to youth and how the world is today really. It's good to move along because situations are inevitable but it's up the person to decision what to do: either sink or swim. In other words it simplifies life in general in three minutes and thirty-seven seconds or one of the few mash-up that comprehends the meaning.



I hope it was alright to post this video, seeing it's for promotional use only, but I think it's worth posting about, not because it was featured on a band's site but it really speaks out to me. No more sugarcoating things but just enduring and hanging in there; the nice guys may finish last, but I find it worth it, in eternity when you know you all you can. That's what makes it in the end.